The Four-Stage Repression Pathology Model and Trait Predisposition
Certain combinations of personality subtraits form a highly conducive psychological profile for progressively reshaping reality to align with one’s internal comfort zone — particularly when it comes to deception and self-deception. This psychological pattern, which may escalate into chronic lying or delusional self-narratives, consists of both passive and active mechanisms.
The passive manifestation often takes the form of willful blindness, a phenomenon characterized by internally focused denial and avoidance of inconvenient truths (Bazerman & Tenbrunsel, 2011). Conversely, the active form tends to be externally directed, involving the calculated deception of others to maintain personal advantage or social façade.
In this article, I will first examine the specific constellation of personality traits that create a predisposition for this dynamic, drawing from contemporary trait theory and psychometric insights. I will then introduce a four-stage repression pathology model inspired by Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray, a literary case study that exemplifies the progressive deepening of self-deception and moral decay through denial, rationalization, and psychological repression.
Self-Induced Repression Mechanics
In psychology, the longstanding debate regarding the relationship between unconscious and conscious thought has shaped much of our understanding of repression. However, within the framework of the four-stage repression pathology model, this interaction can be viewed in a more specific and applied way.
A crucial insight is that when an idea or belief becomes embedded in a person’s conscious cognition — accepted as part of their everyday "truth" — this does not necessarily indicate that the person genuinely believes it at a deeper psychological level. Quite often, the opposite is true. The mechanics of repression reach a point where the individual's neurotic aversion to cognitive dissonance outweighs the discomfort that the original lie or distortion might produce.
In other words, the emotional cost of confronting the truth becomes so overwhelming that the person unconsciously restructures their conscious awareness to avoid it altogether. This is the essence of self-induced repression:
Initially, a conscious choice is made to distort reality, often to achieve a specific goal (e.g., avoiding punishment, gaining an unearned reward, or protecting one's self-image).
Over time, the individual reconstructs additional beliefs and narratives that support the initial deception, weaving them into their broader interpretation of reality.
This eventually automates the repression process, reducing the likelihood that the initial lie — or the cascading distortions built upon it — will resurface in conscious awareness.
By this point, the individual may no longer experience any direct emotional discomfort associated with the lie. However, the repression has become structurally embedded in their worldview, and the act of revisiting the initial deception would pose a severe threat to their sense of identity. The gravity of acknowledging the truth becomes so intense that the mind actively defends against it, making psychological retrieval increasingly difficult as time progresses.
Trait Predisposition to Four-Stage Repression Pathology
Certain personality configurations create a distinct vulnerability to engaging in — and sustaining — the four-stage repression pathology. Contrary to intuition, traits such as high neuroticism, high openness (especially fantasy-proneness), and low orderliness can combine to foster an environment where reality distortion becomes not only possible but self-reinforcing.
1. High Neuroticism (Volatility & Withdrawal)
It might seem logical to assume that heightened neuroticism — particularly emotional volatility — would discourage deception, given that lying may increase stress and inner conflict. However, the opposite is often true. When high neuroticism, especially volatility and withdrawal, coexists with low orderliness and high openness, the result is a potent cocktail for repression pathology.
Volatility drives the individual toward emotional overreactions and impulsivity, which can normalize reactive decision-making and rationalization.
Withdrawal, on the other hand, exacerbates avoidance tendencies, making the suppression of uncomfortable truths a preferred coping mechanism.
The combination of emotional hypersensitivity (volatility) with avoidance patterns (withdrawal) accelerates the shift from momentary self-deception to systemic reality distortion.
2. High Openness (Fantasy-Proneness & Imaginative Thinking)
High openness to experience — particularly in its fantasy-proneness and imaginative dimensions — provides fertile ground for the creative construction of self-justifying narratives.
This trait fuels the proliferation of alternate explanations, often visualized through vivid mental imagery, that rationalize and obscure the original lie.
These short, dream-like distortions bypass rational-analytical processing, replacing objective evaluation with subjective interpretations designed to protect the self from cognitive dissonance.
Conversely, individuals with lower openness and more pragmatic or "engineering-style" cognitive styles tend to halt such distortions earlier, as their inclination toward concrete thinking and reality-based assessment acts as a psychological safeguard.
3. Low Orderliness (Disconnection from External Moral Structures)
Orderliness, a sub-trait of conscientiousness, reflects a person's alignment with external structures such as rules, discipline, and moral codes. Low orderliness erodes the psychological scaffolding that might prevent a person from entering deeper stages of repression pathology.
Without a robust internal sense of “higher order” — whether manifested as respect for societal rules, moral codes, or religious frameworks — there is little to anchor the person to external reality.
In cases where external order does exist (e.g., religious convictions or professional ethics), individuals with low orderliness may first engage in mental renegotiation or dismissal of these structures before progressing further into self-deception.
The lower the inherent psychological need for structure, the easier it becomes to dissolve conflicts between reality and constructed falsehoods.
The Creative-Pathological Paradox
A paradox emerges: the more artistic and imaginative the personality, the greater the vulnerability to repression pathology. Creative individuals, who often view themselves as detached from the “mundane realities” of everyday life, are uniquely positioned to normalize distortions of reality, viewing them as "interpretations" rather than deceptions.
Pathological Nature of Sustained Deception
Importantly, it must be clearly asserted that any conscious, continuous lying that necessitates additional layers of deception to maintain coherence is inherently pathological. Regardless of how socially acceptable or seemingly harmless the lie may appear, the psychological infrastructure required to sustain it is intrinsically maladaptive.
Thus, all sustained and consciously initiated lying is pathological to some degree—it feeds into mechanisms of repression and cognitive fragmentation.
Dorian Gray as a Creative Neurotic with Low Orderliness
Dorian Gray exemplifies a classic profile of high neuroticism, high openness (creativity and fantasy-proneness), and low orderliness, making him a psychological prototype of someone susceptible to repression pathology.
Creative and High Openness
Dorian is deeply entrenched in aestheticism and fantasy, obsessing over beauty and art while living in denial of reality. His fascination with art, sensual pleasures, and symbolic objects like the portrait itself reflects high openness. His willingness to immerse himself in hedonistic and artistic subcultures, particularly after being influenced by Lord Henry and the decadent "yellow book," shows how imagination and detachment from reality fuel his life choices.
Neuroticism (Volatility and Anxiety)
Dorian exhibits emotional volatility and anxiety throughout the novel. His initial horror at seeing the portrait change, followed by his oscillation between guilt (after Sibyl Vane’s death) and rationalization, demonstrates classic signs of neurotic reactivity. As his moral decay progresses, so does his paranoia and fear of exposure, evident in his violent act of murdering Basil Hallward.
Low Orderliness
Dorian’s character lacks a clear moral or structural compass. He systematically rejects both internal and external order — whether through dismissing social ethics, rationalizing betrayal, or discarding religious/moral considerations. His ability to rationalize immorality while maintaining a polished social facade is characteristic of low conscientiousness/orderliness. His internal chaos worsens as he avoids accountability, dissolving any remaining sense of personal order.
Thus, Dorian Gray is a literary representation of a creative neurotic with low orderliness, highly susceptible to constructing an alternative, repressive self-narrative that enables self-deception and moral collapse.
Four-Stage Repression Pathology Model
First Stage: Conscious Desire to Distort Reality
At the outset of the novel, Dorian Gray is portrayed as an impressionable young man, deeply sensitive to the allure of youth and beauty. Under the influence of Lord Henry Wotton, he expresses a conscious and deliberate wish to bend the natural order of life, effectively making a Faustian bargain:
"If it were I who was to be always young, and the picture that was to grow old! For that, I would give everything!”
This moment is emblematic of the first stage of repression pathology — the conscious desire to distort reality. Similar to the psychological mechanics of lying, this stage begins with a willful rejection of reality to secure a perceived personal advantage. For instance, a spouse in a marital relationship may consciously decide: “I will cheat, breaking the promise I made when entering this relationship.” At this stage, the individual is fully aware of violating a moral or social norm to pursue an unearned reward, whether that be avoiding consequences or gaining something they inherently know they should not have.
Dorian, likewise, is asking for an inversion of reality. He does so fully aware that this wish represents a fundamental departure from the natural progression of life. His desire to preserve beauty without bearing the moral or physical burdens associated with it is the foundation of his distorted reality construct.
Cognitive Dissonance and Internal Moral Conflict
In this stage, the individual faces a moral and psychological dilemma. Dorian’s internalized moral compass — his orderliness — still functions at this point, generating cognitive dissonance. He considers himself a good person, yet his wish contradicts this belief system. The portrait, which bears the moral and physical consequences of his actions, becomes a literal and symbolic externalization of his inner dissonance.
Fear of exposure emerges as Dorian’s immediate concern. Rather than confronting his actions, he hides the painting — a behavior typical of individuals in the early stages of sustained lying, where the primary goal is to avoid detection rather than fully internalize the deception.
Neurotic volatility manifests as anxiety, guilt, and distress, as Dorian oscillates between fascination with his wish and fear of its consequences. His high neuroticism triggers a psychological struggle: a battle between the desire to be truthful and the lure of escaping consequences through deception.
If Dorian’s internal sense of orderliness (the subtrait of conscientiousness linked to rule-following and structure) were stronger, it might act as a stabilizing force, enabling him to confront his dissonance and reject the lie. However, with low orderliness, the repression is allowed to progress to the second stage, where deception becomes further internalized and morally rationalized.
Second Stage: Rationalization and Externalization of Responsibility
Dorian Gray’s descent into deeper repression accelerates following his first significant moral transgression: the indirect cause of Sibyl Vane’s suicide. Confronted with the consequences of his cruelty, Dorian chooses not to accept responsibility but instead engages in self-deception and rationalization.
“It seems to me to be simply like a wonderful ending to a wonderful play. It has all the terrible beauty of a Greek tragedy, a tragedy in which I took a great part, but by which I have not been wounded.” (Chapter 8)
Here, Dorian distances himself emotionally from Sibyl’s death. He gaslights himself into believing that her fate was inevitable, or at least outside of his moral jurisdiction. Crucially, Lord Henry’s philosophical influence reinforces this externalization process, encouraging Dorian to dismiss the weight of emotions and ethics altogether.
Mechanics of Externalization and Cognitive Recalibration
At this stage, the individual learns to resolve cognitive dissonance not by confronting the truth, but by constructing psychological mechanisms that shift responsibility outward. Rather than admitting guilt, Dorian projects his shame onto the painting, which now bears the visual markers of his cruelty while his outward appearance remains flawless. This external object becomes a repository for guilt and a symbolic separation of his "public self" from his true nature.
Psychological Parallel to Everyday Deception
This mirrors common rationalization patterns seen in pathological lying or self-deception. Typically, when individuals engage in sustained lying, they begin to generate a series of justifications designed to mitigate the emotional discomfortof guilt. While they may not fully absolve themselves internally, they manage to create enough psychological distancefrom the wrongdoing to continue functioning without being paralyzed by self-reproach.
External attributions — blaming circumstances, other people, or even one’s mental state — allow the liar to split their identity from the act itself.
In Dorian’s case, Sibyl’s emotional fragility is seen as her own flaw, rather than a consequence of his abandonment.
This enables Dorian to maintain his self-image of innocence while the painting absorbs the moral cost.
In more everyday contexts, such as an unfaithful spouse, this internal dialogue may sound like: “I had to cheat because my spouse’s neglect left me no other choice.” Here, agency is downplayed, and the moral responsibility is externalized.
Rationalization as Repression Fuel
By outsourcing blame, the individual quiets the inner moral enforcement driven by residual orderliness or conscientiousness. The cognitive dissonance that initially caused emotional disturbance during the first stage now begins to dissipate, as the mind finds increasingly creative ways to rationalize the distortion of reality.
For Dorian, this marks a pivotal moment: rather than confronting the ethical weight of Sibyl’s death, he shifts the narrative, setting himself on a trajectory where further moral failures can be similarly rationalized.
Third Stage: Automated Lying and the Loss of Psychological Distress
This stage marks a critical pivot point where the repression of the initial deception becomes fully operational and integrated into the individual’s behavioral system. The third stage is often the longest, characterized by the transition from occasional deception to habitual lying, devoid of the emotional distress that initially accompanied the act.
Dorian Gray and the Automation of Deceit
As Wilde’s narrative progresses, Dorian’s transgressions become more severe, yet his psychological resistance and guilt diminish. His moral desensitization becomes clear:
Lies Become Easier: Where Dorian once feared the portrait’s corruption, it now serves as a psychological shield. He no longer fixates on the initial Faustian wish but operates comfortably within the reality he has reconstructed.
Emotional Detachment: By the time he murders Basil Hallward, Dorian acts with chilling indifference. This act marks the loss of moral conflict; the original cognitive dissonance that once accompanied his deception has been fully repressed.
Inversion of Reality: Dorian convinces himself that as long as he avoids confronting the painting, he remains morally untainted. The portrait becomes a symbolic container for the truth, which he actively avoids, perpetuating his belief in his false purity.
The Automated Mechanics of the Third Stage
In this stage, deception becomes automated—an unconscious process. The individual no longer needs to manually rationalize every lie, as the foundational error has been fully integrated into unconscious processes. This frees the person to commit further transgressions with ease, as the internal resistance mechanisms (such as guilt, shame, or moral checks) have been bypassed or silenced.
Example of Rationalization in Everyday Contexts
In the context of an unfaithful spouse, this might manifest as a habitual and normalized internal dialogue such as:
“It’s not really cheating if one is not married,” allowing for constant deception ("I’m going to the beauty salon" when meeting a lover) without the emotional weight once associated with the lie. Over time, the original betrayal becomes “too hard to look at”, and is symbolically repressed, much like Dorian avoids looking at the portrait.
The Nonlinear Duration of Stage Three
The length of this phase varies depending on:
The gravity of the initial deception (e.g., murder versus infidelity),
The accumulation of additional lies built upon the original falsehood.
In some cases, individuals may progress to the fourth stage in days, while in others, this phase may persist for months or even years. However, once the underlying repression model is fully functional, transition to the final stage becomes inevitable—especially as the emotional, relational, or existential consequences of compounded deception accumulate.
Personality Correlates
This pattern is especially common among individuals with:
High neuroticism, which initially fuels dissonance but later leads to maladaptive avoidance,
High openness, which facilitates the creative reconstruction of reality,
Low orderliness, which weakens internal structures (e.g., moral codes, discipline) that would otherwise interrupt this psychological drift.
The longer this third stage persists, the more profound the psychological, social, and existential consequences become when the final collapse occurs in the fourth stage.
Fourth Stage: The Collapse and the Failure of Self-Deception
In the final phase of the four-stage repression pathology, the carefully constructed web of deception collapses under its own weight. In The Picture of Dorian Gray, this collapse is marked by Dorian’s fleeting attempt at redemption. He believes that a single act of kindness might reverse the moral and psychological damage reflected in the portrait:
“Yet it was his duty to confess, to suffer punishment, to expiate. He was determined to do it. He would tell everything. He would finish the portrait.” (Chapter 20)
However, upon confronting the painting, Dorian realizes that even his so-called virtue is tainted by self-serving motives. His gesture is not born from true remorse but from vanity and a desire for self-preservation. This moment marks the collapse of self-deception:
Moral blindness: Dorian has lost the capacity to distinguish authentic morality from performative gestures.
Full corruption: The portrait does not merely reveal isolated sins but the complete psychological erosion of his identity.
The Mechanics of the Collapse
In repression pathology, this stage is defined by the disintegration of the constructed false reality. After prolonged deception, the mind’s ability to compartmentalize or rationalize collapses.
The accumulated weight of unaddressed guilt,
the sheer volume of lies built upon the original falsehood,
and the psychic fatigue of living in contradiction,
combine to make repression unsustainable.
The individual is forced to confront the raw, unfiltered truth of their actions. This confrontation often manifests as emotional breakdown, existential despair, or in Dorian’s case—self-destruction.
Dorian’s Symbolic End
In his desperation, Dorian destroys the painting, inadvertently killing himself. The act represents more than physical death; it is the annihilation of the false self. The portrait is the vessel for his repressed truth—by destroying it, Dorian dismantles the psychological structure sustaining his identity.
The Universality of Stage Four
The fourth stage is inevitable in every case of prolonged and escalating deception. While many individuals trapped in this cycle believe they can sustain the false reality indefinitely, collapse is always a matter of when, not if.
Sometimes the collapse occurs through external forces—exposure, relational breakdown, or public disgrace.
In other cases, it arises from internal implosion—a psychological crisis or depressive breakdown.
Rebuilding After Collapse
Post-collapse, individuals are left with a broken self-structure. Recovery is only possible through radical honesty and total acceptance of responsibility. Partial confessions or externalizing blame prolong the pathology. True reconstruction of identity requires full acknowledgment of one’s moral failings and a deliberate reordering of internal value systems.
Without absolute responsibility, the individual risks recycling into the earlier stages, never achieving true psychological resolution.
Conclusion: The Power of Structure Against Self-Destruction
The four-stage repression pathology, as exemplified by the psychological journey of Dorian Gray, reveals how individuals progressively reconstruct and detach from reality through sustained deception—first consciously, then habitually, and ultimately destructively. What begins as a conscious choice to distort reality evolves into a dangerous psychological spiral where lies become automated, emotional detachment deepens, and the self collapses under the cumulative weight of unreconciled actions and moral avoidance.
This model demonstrates that repression pathology is not merely a literary device, but a very real psychological mechanism shaped by personality traits such as high neuroticism, fantasy-prone openness, and low orderliness. These traits facilitate the rationalization and externalization that fuel a dangerous cycle of self-deception.
Yet, this trajectory is neither unavoidable nor irreversible.
Structured Internal Value Hierarchies (SIVHs) emerge as both a preventative tool and a framework for post-collapse identity reconstruction. By embedding values such as truthfulness, responsibility, and personal growth into an individual’s decision-making structure, SIVHs help prevent the initiation of self-deception in the first place. For those who have already descended into repression pathology, SIVHs provide a map back to coherence, offering a way to rebuild identity on a foundation of integrity and conscious alignment with objective reality.
Ultimately, the lesson is clear: without internalized structures and clear values, even the most intelligent or creative individuals are vulnerable to the slow erosion of self that accompanies unchecked repression and deception. Conversely, with the right frameworks—rooted in radical responsibility—individuals can prevent or escape this pathology and reconstruct a meaningful and resilient sense of self.
Some of the References Used for the Article
Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Wilde, O. (1890). The Picture of Dorian Gray. Lippincott’s Monthly Magazine.
Curtis, C. E., & Hart, C. L. (2020). Pathological Lying: A Psychodynamic Perspective. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(6), 1-8.
Carter, C. S. (2007). Sex differences in oxytocin and vasopressin: Implications for autism spectrum disorders? Behavioural Brain Research, 176(1), 170-186.
McEwen, B. S., & Milner, T. A. (2017). Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1-2), 24-39.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. Guilford Press.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential Psychotherapy. Basic Books.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (2015). The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life. Random House.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, Vol. 1, pp. 45-103.
Freud, S. (1915). Repression. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV.
Vaillant, G. E. (1992). Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. American Psychiatric Publishing.
